[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - footway=indoor

[Simon Poole]

Was going to ask the same thing, not that I don't think that both are
redundant, but why have two -different- redundant tags?

Am 05.09.2019 um 18:46 schrieb Leif Rasmussen:
> How is this different from highway=corridor?  
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019, 12:42 PM Jeremiah Rose <jrose at aph.org
> <mailto:jrose at aph.org>> wrote:
>
>     Here's a proposal for marking indoor routes within a building
>     mapped with Simple Indoor Tagging.
>
>     footway=indoor: indoor pedestrian route
>     https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/footway%3Dindoor
>
>     Jeremiah Rose
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Tagging mailing list
>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190905/a40f6531/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190905/a40f6531/attachment-0001.sig>