[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Campsite properties

Joseph Eisenberg joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com
Tue Sep 10 05:14:21 UTC 2019


>shower:fee=yes

I believe "yes/no" is better for fee, since the value may change frequently.

 If you are mapping detailed information about the showers, it would
be best to map these as a separate node with amenity=shower, if you
know it's correct location.

In that case you could use hot_water=yes and fee=yes etc. instead of
having to use namespacing. See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dshower

The proposal only approves shower=yes/no and amenity=shower but that
doesn't stop you from using shower=hot and shower:fee=* if you want
to.

> capacity:powered / power_supply=30 ?

While you could do that, if you are getting into that much detail it
might be better to map each tourism=camp_pitch, if you have time for
it. Then you can tag each camp_pitch with power_supply individually.

- Joseph

On 9/10/19, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 at 11:22, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Another question :-)
>>
>
> & again!
>
> There are powered pitches available, but there are only 30 of them (mixture
> of tent & caravan), while there are virtually unlimited numbers of
> unpowered pitches.
>
> capacity:powered / power_supply=30 ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>>
>



More information about the Tagging mailing list