[Tagging] Draft proposal for Key:aerodrome
ajt1047 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 10 11:35:02 UTC 2019
On 10/09/2019 11:28, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>> That seems like a bad idea because aerodrome:type is one of the ways
>> that mappers distinguish between military and non-military airfields.
> military=airfield + landuse=military is the standard way to do this.
I wasn't making any comment about what may or may not be the "standard"
way to do this; just saying that aerodrome:type is one of the ways that
mappers distinguish between military and non-military airfields.
You'll notice that in that area (and I'm sure elsewhere) that there are
edge cases - "military=airfield + landuse=military" won't exclude
Cambeltown, which has the old IATA code in OSM but isn't currently
You didn't mention military at all in your initial email, which seems
like an omission.
More information about the Tagging