[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Campsite properties

[Warin]

On 18/09/19 09:02, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 23:46, brad <bradhaack at fastmail.com 
> <mailto:bradhaack at fastmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I think it's valid tag for a campsite,
>
>
> I think it can be, on larger camp sites, which have several washing 
> machines in a
> dedicated building.
>
>      It's not much different than any other self service coin operated
>     laundry.
>
>
> Yes and no.  Many camp sites charge, and do so with a coin-op 
> mechanism.  The problem
> is tagging the access.  Those machines are generally available for use 
> only by people
> staying on the site (they could accept anyone, but usually do not).  
> How are you going
> to tag that?  We don't have access=campers and access=customers 
> doesn't really
> make sense because anybody using a coin-op machine is a customer.  
> It's possible
> we need access=residents,

The campers are customers of the camp-site .. tag the camp-site as 
access customers and then only campers can get to the laundry.

Residents? To me that means people living there, long term. Campers are 
usually tourists, short term.. so not residents.

> which would have possible usages in other situations
> such as camping site shops (some are open to non-residents) and things 
> like
> gyms or washing machines in apartment blocks.  But trying to use 
> access=* for
> anything not related to transport gets a lot of (probably justified) 
> dissent.

It gets used for clubs, swimming pools, sporting facilities...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190918/f777be1c/attachment.html>