[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Campsite properties

[Simon Poole]

Am 18.09.2019 um 09:37 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 18. Sep 2019, at 09:22, Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> wrote:
>>
>> My point was more that you should ignore the shop classification and
>> assume that that this is simply facility that in some form provides
>> access to clothes washing machines and space, because even a completely
>> normal laundromat facility is not a shop. In hindsight it should have
>> always been amenity=laundry (or similar) but that is a done deal.
>
> IMHO we shouldn’t ignore classifications. It would be easier to follow your argument if the tag was indeed amenity=laundry but as it isn’t, the tag should be used for what in OpenStreetMap is a shop (a business selling goods or services)

Then nearly all amenities and leisure objects would be shops, consider
for example amentity=toilets Which, as you likely know :-), exist both
in free and paid versions. Providing access to a facility for use,
regardless if free or not, is not a shop, not even in OSM.

Simon

> Cheers Martin 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190918/e1cca909/attachment-0001.sig>