[Tagging] Was there every a proposal for the disused:key=* / abandoned:key=* lifecycle prefixes?

[Mateusz Konieczny]

27 Sep 2019, 01:37 by graemefitz1 at gmail.com:

>
>
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 02:52, Kevin Kenny <> kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com <mailto:kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com>> > wrote:
>
>>
>> I've also mapped things like 'disused:amenity=prison
>>  landuse=brownfield' for a now-closed prison that the state is trying
>>  to find a buyer to redevelop. The buildings are still standing (and I
>>  understand are for the most part structurally sound), but what would a
>>  buyer do with them?
>>
>
> Legal offices would seem the most appropriate? :-) 
>
> Going back to the disused / abandoned discussion, is this a good time to ask about destroyed:?
>
> A tourism establishment in our area has just been destroyed by a bushfire :-( 
>
> It's planned to rebuild on the same spot, so I've marked the existing tourism=guest_house & amenity=restaurant tags as destroyed:, together with a "description" note. This has removed them from the map. Is that the right way of doing it?
>
It seems ok to me. Updated maps will
show current situation, reduced chance
for armchair mappers to map it from 
aerial images.
>
> The associated camping ground wasn't damaged in any way (beyond losing power & telephone lines) but is also temporarily closed for "a while" pending road repairs & re-connection of power etc.
>
> What's the best way of marking that? 
>
Lifecycle prefixes work better fine.
disused:leisure=* etc.

Though in case of things staying in this
state for years  and without traces on the groundI would delete them as gone.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190927/fdd40610/attachment.html>