[Tagging] Route names that aren’t names

[Yves]

Surely this can be fixed if needed, but Osm2pgsql still has a route_name column?
A strange and evil case of rendering for the mapper.
Yves 

Le 2 avril 2020 23:00:53 GMT+02:00, Richard Fairhurst <richard at systemed.net> a écrit :
>Peter Elderson wrote:
>> Suggestion for rendering:
>> What about osmc:name=*
>> I know, doesn't exist, but it's a logical companion of osmc:symbol.
>> Definition would be: name to show on the map.
>> Definition should be: just the simple name as found in the field, or 
>> the nae ecerybody knows and uses, no extra's.
>
>That's pretty good _except_ for the tag name, I think. The osmc: prefix
>comes from a particular (fairly obscure) bit of software called OSM
>Composer, and for historical reasons it's become the popular tag for
>symbols, but there's no reason to perpetuate that into other tags. I'd
>be
>100% on board with using route_name= with your suggested definition.
>
>Richard
>
>
>
>--
>Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f5258744.html
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200402/3a0effad/attachment-0001.htm>