[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Refugee Site Location
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Thu Apr 16 00:16:32 UTC 2020
On 16/4/20 1:23 am, Manon Viou wrote:
> Thanks Martin, yes, refugee sites should always be temporary even if,
> as you said, some turn to be very long term places. That's why we do
> not suggest to add temporary/permanent options.
> Manon
In which case the description for amenity=social_facility +
social_facility=shelter is not correct.
If it is to be done on area then specify the number of square meters
rather than the number of buildings???
Buildings can be a of different sizes and capacities. An area could be
more consistent as to the number of people.
Imagery may not be up to date so counting buildings may not be possible.
>> Le 15 avril 2020 à 11:36, Martin Koppenhoefer <
>> dieterdreist at gmail.com <mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>
>> sent from a phone
>>
>>> On 15. Apr 2020, at 01:13, Warin < 61sundowner at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I would think amenity=refugee_site is an area set aside for the
>>> non-temporary residential use of refugees
>>
>> maybe I’m a dreamer, but I would expect all refugee related features
>> to be “temporary”, even if we are talking about relatively long
>> periods of time
>>
>> Cheers Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200416/18103272/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list