[Tagging] Refining heritage tag

[António Madeira]

As I already wrote before in this thread, lutz already agreed with and
supported my proposal.
My problem with the actual ref tag is that there are many ref tags for
other schemes and elements, but I don't know if this concern is
pointless or not.
I would like to see this scheme more organized and not so ambiguous data
wise, but I don't know if that's technically better or if there are
actual problems with ref tag being "all over the place".


Às 19:56 de 20/04/2020, Paul Allen escreveu:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 16:47, António Madeira <antoniomadeira at gmx.com
> <mailto:antoniomadeira at gmx.com>> wrote:
>
>     So, I would like to know what would be the technical pros and cons
>     regarding heritage:ref:operator=* vs ref:operator=* , i.e. the
>     database use, rendering, consulting, exporting etc.
>
>
> AFAIK, only one map makes use of heritage*.  So if you can persuade
> lutz that
> your scheme is a good one, it will be dealt with accordingly.
>
> --
> Paul
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200420/62f178eb/attachment.htm>