[Tagging] kerb=regular vs. raised
supaplex at riseup.net
Sat Aug 1 07:37:31 UTC 2020
There was no change in the OSM database, so the project is not affected.
kerb=regular anyway is already in use but undocumented. Current
wheelchair/mobily projects should anyway consider this existing tagging.
As I described it needs clarity in the differentiation between raised
and regular kerbs and after the discussion here, I felt that this list
more agreed rather than opposed.
Am 01.08.20 um 09:01 schrieb Volker Schmidt:
> Please revert this wiki change.
> The kerb hight values have been used in at least one project documenting
> wheelchair accessibility.
> On Sat, 1 Aug 2020, 08:53 Supaplex, <supaplex at riseup.net> wrote:
>> As an result of this diskussion (no strong opposition, some general
>> remarks, some endorsement) I added "kerb=regular" to the tagging example
>> list in the wiki and adjusted hight descriptions (with values discussed
>> here). If there is further need for discussion and changes, it could be
>> carried out in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:kerb
>> Greets, Alex
>> Am 29.07.20 um 20:56 schrieb Supaplex:
>> Hey all,
>> I started mapping detailed sidewalk information in my area, including
>> crossing and kerb information. It seems that there is a lack of clarity
>> in the differentiation between raised and regular ("normal", neither
>> lowered nor raised) kerbs. "kerb=regular" is already in use but is
>> undocumented and should be explicitly distinguished from "kerb=raised".
>> There is a relevant difference not only for wheelchair users, but also
>> for other mobility groups (cargo bikes, strollers, pedestrians with
>> reduced mobility…).
>> So I propose adding "kerb=regular" to the tagging list in the wiki as
>> well as suitable descriptions for height, use… and an example image. I
>> made a suggestion in the wiki (since there has been no reaction so far I
>> post it here):https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:kerb#kerb.3Dregular_vs._raised_--_add_.22regular.22_example
>> Is there a reason not to add this? Otherwise I’ll do that.
>> Greets, Alex
>> Tagging mailing listTagging at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging