[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - more parking types

[Joseph Eisenberg]

Re: status to indicate "was not voted upon but is widely used and
most people are happy with it"

That's the "de facto" status.

-- Joseph Eisenberg

On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 6:09 AM Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 7 Aug 2020 at 13:53, Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlke.floss at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Well, yes, voting "no" is probably not useful, but this is also the
>> least "interesting" bit of the proposal. The purpose here would be just
>> to bless the tag with "status=approved" rather than "status=de-facto".
>>
>
> But it wasn't approved by a formal vote.  If you mark it status=approved
> then
> it ought to be possible to find the vote that approved it.  Maybe we need
> a different status to indicate "was not voted upon but is widely used and
> most people are happy with it" but we don't have that.  Please don't
> misuse "approved" to mean that.
>
>
> --
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200807/2a954879/attachment.htm>