[Tagging] PTv2 public_transport=stop_position for stop positions that vary based on train length
80hnhtv4agou at bk.ru
80hnhtv4agou at bk.ru
Tue Aug 11 15:46:37 UTC 2020
this is missing my original talk.
IN the chicago area we have 3 railway company’s operating the system, and one had signs left up from the old days
which in watching the train come into that stations platform did not stop at the sign based on the number of cars + the
diesel engines or engines. which could be 5, 6, 7, or 8 cars, we stop at 8 here. 1 or 2 engines.
i should say more here, 1.who is driving the train, 2.what co. does he work for, 3.how long is the train,
4.how long is the platform, 5 what is the time of day, am rush, pm rush, midday, evening . 6. out of all the cars what are
being used, open, 7. weekend, or week day, 8.raining or snowing, 9.end of the line, 10.is the platform so short
that only 2 cars will fit. 11.is the train pushing or pulling. (it does not work here you can not tag all 400 platforms the same.)
>Monday, August 10, 2020 10:51 PM -05:00 from Warin < 61sundowner at gmail.com >:
>On 11/8/20 1:11 pm, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging wrote:
>>the train or trains do not stop where he says they do,
>Do they stop at the platform? Yes.
>So stop positions maybe mapped.
>>and i am talking about 400 +,
>>unverified platforms. which is 200 + stations,
>Unverified? Verified by the existing signs? This maybe 'out of date' but still verifiable.
>How 'inaccurate' are the present stop positions?
>How precise is the mapped position required?
>Were there stop positions there before?
>Is it not better to have some indication rather than nothing?
>"They will stay there for ever".... unless someone improves them.
>>>Monday, August 10, 2020 9:33 PM -05:00 from Warin < 61sundowner at gmail.com >:
>>>On 11/8/20 9:25 am, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging wrote:
>>>>one of the points that i talked about, that no one has answered yet is what about someone not local
>>>>who just puts 400 + unverified stops on platforms and there all wrong.
>>>If you find something wrong - correct it.
>>>If the things mapped are deceitful, malicious etc then report it to the DWG to prevent more of the same.
>>>If the things mapped are better than what was there before then I would call them improvements and thus beneficial, no point in being upset by it.
>>>Being local is not a requirement to map, get over it. Local knowledge is beneficial as it aids mapping things that have local characteristics - like where trains stop
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging