[Tagging] Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Fri Aug 14 10:09:20 UTC 2020




14 Aug 2020, 10:53 by ycai at mailbox.org:

> On 14.08.20 10:40, dktue wrote:
>
>>> I would define it as:
>>>
>>> lower_station: station that has the lowest elevation (exact elevation is not necessary to know, it's obvious)
>>> upper_station: station that has the highest elevation
>>> mid_station: any other station
>>>
>> I want to add: At least in Germany, Switzerland and Austria there are well-established german words which you often find in the name of the stations themselves:
>>
>> * "Talstation" ("valley station")
>> * "Bergstation" ("mountain station"), sometimes also "Gipfelstation" ("summit station")
>> * "Mittelstation" ("mid station")
>>
>> There should be a machine-readeably tagging to get this information that is so often encoded in the name. That's why I'm suggesting this tagging.
>>
>>
> Then why not valley / mid / mountain as values ? If the mountain station is lower than the mid- one, there is no discussion.
>
Become bottom station may beĀ 
located not in the valley and top may
be on the hill, not mountain.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200814/27bdb662/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list