[Tagging] Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

dktue email at daniel-korn.de
Fri Aug 14 11:55:18 UTC 2020



Am 14.08.2020 um 13:34 schrieb Colin Smale:
>
> On 2020-08-14 13:14, dktue wrote:
>
>> Am 14.08.2020 um 13:11 schrieb Yves:
>>> Base / mid / head?
>> I'm definitely open for that! :-)
> OK, two people agree on the strings to use, but what are the 
> semantics? What sentence would go in the wiki to describe a) when to 
> use the value and b) what the value implies once it is in the OSM data?
> It sounds like it might be something like:
> base: the end station with the lower altitude
> head: the end station with the higher altitude
> mid: any station, not being a base or a head station, irrespective of 
> the altitude
> note: based purely on altitude, not arrival/departure inclination
That sounds perfectly reasoneable to me!

> As to which key to use, how about aerialway:station={base,mid,head}?
I suggested station={base,mid,head} because we're using aerial=station 
and then it seemed natural to go with station=* but I'd be definitely 
happy with aerialway:station=*.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200814/dcd39334/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list