[Tagging] Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Fri Aug 14 15:32:08 UTC 2020


I strongly prefer up/top over head.

At least for me (not representative,
not a native speaker), head = up
is not clear.

14 Aug 2020, 17:05 by email at daniel-korn.de:

> Am 14.08.2020 um 16:37 schrieb yvecai:
>  
>
>>
>> I would propose, if you want to use altitude as a definition:
>>
>>
>>> bottom: the end station with the lower altitude
>>> up: the end station with the higher altitude
>>> mid: any station, not being a base or a head          station, irrespective of the altitude
>>>
>>
>> Or, alternatively one that does not compete with the ele tag          and carry a destination meaning (my preference):
>>
>>
>>> base: the 'valley' station, usually with the lower          altitude
>>> head: the 'mountain' or 'top' station, usually          with the higher altitude
>>> mid: any station, not being a base or a head          station.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> aewrialway:station has my preference
>>
>>
>> Yves
>>
>>
> I like both. Any other people here with a peference for one of Yves'    schemes?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200814/15e9fc12/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list