[Tagging] Antwort: Re: Aerialway stations

Yves ycai at mailbox.org
Fri Aug 14 16:07:53 UTC 2020


I'm not a natural speaker, head like in where the aerialway is heading.
I propose the second scheme because of the duplicate meaning with ele in the definition, and because the aim of an aerialway could be lower than mid. 
Yves 

Le 14 août 2020 17:32:08 GMT+02:00, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> a écrit :
>I strongly prefer up/top over head.
>
>At least for me (not representative,
>not a native speaker), head = up
>is not clear.
>
>14 Aug 2020, 17:05 by email at daniel-korn.de:
>
>> Am 14.08.2020 um 16:37 schrieb yvecai:
>>  
>>
>>>
>>> I would propose, if you want to use altitude as a definition:
>>>
>>>
>>>> bottom: the end station with the lower altitude
>>>> up: the end station with the higher altitude
>>>> mid: any station, not being a base or a head          station, irrespective of the altitude
>>>>
>>>
>>> Or, alternatively one that does not compete with the ele tag          and carry a destination meaning (my preference):
>>>
>>>
>>>> base: the 'valley' station, usually with the lower          altitude
>>>> head: the 'mountain' or 'top' station, usually          with the higher altitude
>>>> mid: any station, not being a base or a head          station.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> aewrialway:station has my preference
>>>
>>>
>>> Yves
>>>
>>>
>> I like both. Any other people here with a peference for one of Yves'    schemes?
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200814/18df7ff8/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list