[Tagging] oneway=yes on motorways

António Madeira antoniomadeira at gmx.com
Fri Aug 14 18:35:47 UTC 2020


So, should this contradiction be eliminated from the wiki or not?


Às 09:32 de 26/05/2020, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging escreveu:
> Based on my experience it is usually better to write something, even
> not ideal and
> ask for a review.
>
> "Someone should write/expand it" is typically ignored.
>
> May 26, 2020, 10:58 by voschix at gmail.com:
>
>     Please come back to my original question: /I would like to
>     eliminate the contradiction in the wiki. What wording do you propose?/
>
>     On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 10:23, Jean-Marc Liotier <jm at liotier.org
>     <mailto:jm at liotier.org>> wrote:
>
>         On 5/26/20 5:44 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>>             It can't hurt to specify oneway=yes. I have noticed that
>>             the JOSM style
>>             that shows lane counts and lane use will sometimes not
>>             show ways
>>             properly if oneway=yes isn't there, but that's probably a
>>             bug in the
>>             style more than an indictment of implying oneway=yes.
>>
>>
>>         I'm on the side of "team tag explicitly" on this.  If
>>         anything, it gives validators more to work with if you start
>>         doing something weird.
>
>         Isn't that what oneway=no is for ?
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Tagging mailing list
>         Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200814/642f1c39/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list