[Tagging] Canopy Walkways
Jake Edmonds
jake_edmonds at me.com
Fri Aug 21 07:18:56 UTC 2020
I couldn’t call a boardwalk a bridge either, but it’s used as a bridge value
> On 21 Aug 2020, at 09:14, Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> footway on bridge construction, so highway=footway, bridge=yes seems ok.
>
> Canopy walkway is the term I see used everywhere, not canopy bridge.
>
> Makes sense to attach the canopy detail to the footway then. So footway=canopy_walkway sounds right to me.
>
>
> Best, Peter Elderson
>
>
> Op vr 21 aug. 2020 om 08:46 schreef Volker Schmidt <voschix at gmail.com <mailto:voschix at gmail.com>>:
> The footway= approach isn't so good. A canopy walkway is more a bridge type.
>
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, 00:28 Graeme Fitzpatrick, <graemefitz1 at gmail.com <mailto:graemefitz1 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 07:50, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com <mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Or maybe footway=canopy_walkway? highway= Footway and bridge=yes seem essential for a basic description.
>
> The combination of the three of them seems like a good, simple solution!
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200821/59d31ff5/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list