[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 5. Dec 2020, at 22:34, Niels Elgaard Larsen <elgaard at agol.dk> wrote:
> 
> Volker Schmidt:
>> Hi,
> 
>> In the case of signed hazards, I see two alternative ways of tagging the signing:
>>  * (only for nodes and ways highway segments) by adding source:xxx=sign like we do
>>    with speed limits
> 
> I this it the best option.
> 
>>  * by mapping the relative signs as nodes
> 
> That often will not work. For example in Denmark on road with high speed limits animal crossing hazards are usually signed ahead of the hazard 


yes, signs are usually ahead of the hazard. We can do both (the signs are best when it comes to verifiability, but if you want routers to warn you, highway properties or nodes on the highway bear a much greater probability of being implemented)

Cheers Martin