[Tagging] Many historic=wayside_cross are not historic

[Paul Allen]

On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 23:11, Volker Schmidt <voschix at gmail.com> wrote:

> That includes everything from a homemade little altar on the fence of a
> private home to a minute chapel-like shrine on a minor road crossing that
> most likely sits on top  of a Roman shrine for the local water goddess.
>
> My real question is: Am I correct that this is the accepted tagging after
> all, and that's it?
>

It is in use, perhaps even de facto.  Some purists (such as myself) think
it is
not always justified.

-- 
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201207/4f213fc8/attachment.htm>