[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tag:traffic_calming=hillocky

[Yves]

Maybe it's time to create a sub-category of traffic_calming=bump with another tag for the peace of mind of data consumer and not bridle too much (though I think it is not possible) the creativity of traffic calming features creators?
Yves 

Le 20 décembre 2020 11:42:56 GMT+01:00, "Tomáš Hurýn" <thuryn1 at gmail.com> a écrit :
>ok, so we can call value fo this tag: circle_humps. What do you all think of it?
>
>Dne neděle 20. prosince 2020 0:31:07 CET, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging napsal(a):
>> Round Circle Speed Humps
>> 
>> >Saturday, December 19, 2020 5:29 PM -06:00 from Paul Allen
>> ><pla16021 at gmail.com>: 
>> >
>> >On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 at 23:19, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging < 
>tagging at openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>> >>https://streetsolutionsuk.co.uk/collections/speed-ramps/products/round-yel
>> >>low-circle-speed-humps-50mm?variant=19772633645113>
>> > 
>> >That didn't take me where you intended.  I had to navigate from where I
>> >ended up to those things.  Ended up at the URL you gave, but couldn't get
>> >there directly.  It calls them speed bumps.  Which doesn't answer my
>> >original question of whether the word "bumb" in the proposal was a typo or
>> >yet another kind of traffic calming device.
>> > 
>> >It also doesn't directly answer if these function in the same way as
>> >rumble strips or as speed bumps, but from the name I'd guess
>> >they're not an alternative to rumble strips.
>> > 
>> >--
>> >Paul
>> > 
>> 
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201220/255821f4/attachment-0001.htm>