[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

[Peter Elderson]

10..20, meaning 10 up to and including 20

Mvg Peter Elderson

> Op 24 dec. 2020 om 00:05 heeft ipswichmapper--- via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> 
> 1. Those were simply suggestions on how a geocoder could try and guess if a hypenated addr:housenumber tag is a range or a single housenumber. Its not some explicit rule. ideally all housenumbers with hypens in them should be accompanied with an addr:range tag.
> 
> 2. What old operator?
> -- 
> 
> 
> 23 Dec 2020, 22:57 by pelderson at gmail.com:
> 1. What countries are "like the UK"?
> 2. Whatever happened to the old .. indicator for numerical or alphabetical ranges?
> 3. | is still in wide use as an OR operator.
> 
> Mvg Peter Elderson
> 
>>> Op 23 dec. 2020 om 23:00 heeft ipswichmapper--- via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>  
>> Hello everyone,
>> 
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr:range
>> 
>> Here is the updated page. There may be some mistakes / it may not be completely done yet, but it gives a rough overview of addr:range.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> IpswichMapper
>> -- 
>> Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox: 
>> https://tutanota.com
>> 
>> 
>> 23 Dec 2020, 21:04 by tagging at openstreetmap.org:
>> Thats what the addr:range tag is for....
>> 
>> I have explained this in a previous message on this mailing list. I'll update the wiki proposal page so that it much clearer how addr:range works compared to trying to explain in on a mailing list.
>> 
>> Thanks, 
>> IpseichMapper 
>> -- 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 23 Dec 2020, 20:38 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:
>> 
>> 
>> sent from a phone
>> On 23. Dec 2020, at 20:12, ipswichmapper--- via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>> 
>> addr:housenumber="19-100|19-200"
>> 
>> Would imply : 19-100, 19-102, 19-104, 19-106 etc.
>> 
>> 
>> it could also imply 19-100, 19-101, 19-102...
>> and you also can’t know which numbers are included and which do not exist 
>> 
>> Cheers Martin
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201224/cbbac040/attachment-0001.htm>