[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

[Peter Elderson]

TRUE

Mvg Peter Elderson

> Op 24 dec. 2020 om 00:33 heeft ipswichmapper--- via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> 
> So the operator is 2 dots?
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> 23 Dec 2020, 23:20 by pelderson at gmail.com:
> 10..20, meaning 10 up to and including 20
> 
> Mvg Peter Elderson
> 
>>> Op 24 dec. 2020 om 00:05 heeft ipswichmapper--- via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>  
>> 1. Those were simply suggestions on how a geocoder could try and guess if a hypenated addr:housenumber tag is a range or a single housenumber. Its not some explicit rule. ideally all housenumbers with hypens in them should be accompanied with an addr:range tag.
>> 
>> 2. What old operator?
>> -- 
>> 
>> 
>> 23 Dec 2020, 22:57 by pelderson at gmail.com:
>> 1. What countries are "like the UK"?
>> 2. Whatever happened to the old .. indicator for numerical or alphabetical ranges?
>> 3. | is still in wide use as an OR operator.
>> 
>> Mvg Peter Elderson
>> 
>>>> Op 23 dec. 2020 om 23:00 heeft ipswichmapper--- via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>>  
>>> Hello everyone,
>>> 
>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr:range
>>> 
>>> Here is the updated page. There may be some mistakes / it may not be completely done yet, but it gives a rough overview of addr:range.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> IpswichMapper
>>> -- 
>>> Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox: 
>>> https://tutanota.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 23 Dec 2020, 21:04 by tagging at openstreetmap.org:
>>> Thats what the addr:range tag is for....
>>> 
>>> I have explained this in a previous message on this mailing list. I'll update the wiki proposal page so that it much clearer how addr:range works compared to trying to explain in on a mailing list.
>>> 
>>> Thanks, 
>>> IpseichMapper 
>>> -- 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 23 Dec 2020, 20:38 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> sent from a phone
>>> On 23. Dec 2020, at 20:12, ipswichmapper--- via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> addr:housenumber="19-100|19-200"
>>> 
>>> Would imply : 19-100, 19-102, 19-104, 19-106 etc.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> it could also imply 19-100, 19-101, 19-102...
>>> and you also can’t know which numbers are included and which do not exist 
>>> 
>>> Cheers Martin
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201224/0144a46c/attachment.htm>