[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - addr:interpolation on closed ways and nodes

[Steve Doerr]

‘Range’ seems the wrong word to use. If the address is 44-48 High Street, then ‘44 to 48’ is the range, i.e. the lowest and highest values. Maybe ‘interval’ would be better. 

Steve

Sent from my iPhone

> On 23 Dec 2020, at 22:00, ipswichmapper--- via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr:range
> 
> Here is the updated page. There may be some mistakes / it may not be completely done yet, but it gives a rough overview of addr:range.
> 
> Thanks,
> IpswichMapper
> -- 
> Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox: 
> https://tutanota.com
> 
> 
> 23 Dec 2020, 21:04 by tagging at openstreetmap.org:
> Thats what the addr:range tag is for....
> 
> I have explained this in a previous message on this mailing list. I'll update the wiki proposal page so that it much clearer how addr:range works compared to trying to explain in on a mailing list.
> 
> Thanks, 
> IpseichMapper 
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> 23 Dec 2020, 20:38 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:
> 
> 
> sent from a phone
> On 23. Dec 2020, at 20:12, ipswichmapper--- via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> 
> addr:housenumber="19-100|19-200"
> 
> Would imply : 19-100, 19-102, 19-104, 19-106 etc.
> 
> 
> it could also imply 19-100, 19-101, 19-102...
> and you also can’t know which numbers are included and which do not exist 
> 
> Cheers Martin
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201224/ab34c375/attachment.htm>