[Tagging] Non-historic static aircraft

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 at 08:06, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

>
> Dec 27, 2020, 11:32 by theswavu at gmail.com:
>
> Neither of those are aircraft. They're both full size mock-ups for
> training.
>
> Thanks, Andrew - I was only looking at aerial imagery so wasn't aware of
that

> in this case man_made=aircraft would be a poor choice
>
> man_made=aircraft_mockup ?
>

man_made=training_simulator / _simulation / _aid ?

> You wouldn't be able to get either of them off the ground.
>
> This is true also for many historic aircraft that were flying
> some time ago.
>

I know of one that is a non-flying replica, built for filming, now in place
as a memorial to an air crash
https://oreillys.com.au/uncategorized/stinson-replica-plane-restoration-january-2017/

historic=aircraft or historic=memorial?

It is actually currently mapped as a badly-drawn building
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326157997 (with an incorrect note) & also
tagged as a historic=aircraft https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4343830716

Thanks

Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201228/38407c7b/attachment.htm>