[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - wait

António Madeira antoniomadeira at gmx.com
Mon Dec 28 00:18:52 UTC 2020


Doesn't "priority" give the idea that those lanes would have priority?
We want precisely the opposite, to indicate that those lanes have to
"wait" given a stop, give way sign ou traffic signals ahead.

Às 21:01 de 27/12/2020, Martin Koppenhoefer escreveu:
> I can see something like this might be a useful addition to the lanes scheme, but I don’t like the “wait” keyword, something like “priority” seems more descriptive (right_of_way is not handy)
> Your
> wait:lanes=stop|none|give_way
> would become
> priority:lanes=stop|yes|give_way
>
> Cheers Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging




More information about the Tagging mailing list