[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - spring:name

[Francesco Ansanelli]

Il lun 28 dic 2020, 06:45 Brian M. Sperlongano <zelonewolf at gmail.com> ha
scritto:

> I tend to agree. It sounds like this problem should be solved with a
> relation to link the tap and spring.
>

AFAICT a relation is better to describe a more complex scenario, not just
begin and end of a pipe (I oversimplified a bit)...
Anyway somehow you think there is something wrong now, right?
Thanks
Francesco


> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020, 12:40 AM Andrew Errington <erringtona at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I was never a fan of bridge:name=* and I oppose this proposal for the
>> same reason.
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201228/60cfd9f1/attachment.htm>