[Tagging] highway line representation

[yo paseopor]

-Don't forget placement https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:placement
-Also you can have other tags like all the one's from parking:lane scheme
to show some of these "cases" without moving center line.
-Think about it, when we will draw all areas about a road and the software
might "draw" the axis line would draw the "driving line" ?
-When you will draw all the parts of a road are considered to be driven?
No, you can't drive along the parking spaces.

Ara més que mai, Salut i mapes (More than ever, Health and maps)
yopaseopor




<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Libre
de virus. www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 2:17 AM stevea <steveaOSM at softworkers.com> wrote:

> This is what I meant by "centerline," where the traffic switches
> direction.  I know that sometimes this is not the "center" of the
> carriageway (midway between pavement, say), as when there are unequal
> numbers of lanes.  At closer resolution than that, seeing paint marking /
> raised (Botts?) dots / lane markers in aerial imagery (with decimeter /
> centimeter accuracy or resolution) seems like it is a state of the art in
> some places.  I'm sure that's true, thank you for confirming.
>
> At that point, I'd rather not start an argument about where "centerline"
> is but rather best describe the rich set of lanes data that now exist in
> the real world and how those best live in OSM as data.
>
> I think what you are asking is "now that we have higher-resolution
> (centimeter) data..." how do we tag?  I think we have the tagging syntaxes
> we need to tag.  Do we not?  We have both "better" imagery and we have
> "lanes" tagging going on all over (even where there are no high-resolution
> data).  What is the question, again?
>
> Oh:  "Which of variants 'might' we map?"  I'd say "as we have been, simply
> with greater granularity (lanes, more...) partially due to higher
> resolution imagery."  And I continue to listen to another question, perhaps
> I misunderstand.
>
> I believe Alex is the OP:  if the question is "do we RE-map what OSM has,
> now that we have higher-resolution data?" well, that's potentially a big
> topic.  Such higher-resolution data might inspire you to improve tagging,
> not "wholesale replace" it, but in a particular case, persuasion could go
> either way.
>
> SteveA
>
> > On Dec 26, 2020, at 4:19 PM, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 26/12/20 7:58 pm, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> >>
> >> sent from a phone
> >>
> >>> On 26. Dec 2020, at 01:28, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Where the number of opposing lanes are not equal I would take the line
> that divides the traffic into opposing directions.
> >>
> >> afaik the agreement is to use the centre of the carriageway.
> >
> >
> > Where did the 'agreement' consider the unequal number of lane direction?
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201228/80dd6343/attachment.htm>