[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - spring:name

Paul Allen pla16021 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 28 15:04:49 UTC 2020


On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 at 14:28, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Only 1 node has both tags (amenity=drinking_water + natural=spring) -
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3420899209 - this is a node next to a
> river and a small park or picnic site, so it seems more likely that it is a
> drinking fountain or bubbler rather than a spring.
>

You were wise to qualify that with "more likely." :)

There is no tap associated with this spring, just a cover and an outlet
pipe.
But it is next to a river, a car park and a picnic site (which I thought I'd
mapped, but apparently not).  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7504500759

A blog entry which has several photos of it, including the outlet.
https://www.evans-crittens.com/2019/03/snapshots-cenarth-falls-ceredigion-march-2019.html

-- 
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20201228/02f1089c/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list