[Tagging] amenity=faculty?

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> Il giorno 7 feb 2020, alle ore 10:19, Lionel Giard <lionel.giard at gmail.com> ha scritto:
> 
> But creating a new relation type which would be with the same specification than a site relation would be a bit weird to me.


we’ve done this for boundary relations too, which are essentially multipolygons plus admin centre roles.
If a new relationtype has similar or the same workings but different semantics, it would be a oneliner for data consumers to add support-if they wish.

Cheers Martin