[Tagging] [Tagging} no stopping, no parking

[Volker Schmidt]

(I am looking at these tags for the first time, so please forgive me if I
am asking newbie questions)

Apart form being somewhat contradictory to have a parking lane on which you
cannot park, this tagging scheme seems to have a basic flaw:
It cannot distinguish from this tagging between
       there is a lane along the road, but I am not allowed to park/stop on
it (i.e. it's an emergency lane)
and
       there is no additional lane and I am not allowed to park/stop on the
road
I would need an additional shoulder=yes|no to distinguish between the two
cases.





On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 at 20:43, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> Have you considered how other, more complex, situations would be tagged?
> Would it be possible to tag this in consistent way?
>
> Note also that "stopping=yes|no" is unclear and
> "parking:lane:both=no_stopping" is
> clear.
>
> (note I have not checked whatever this tags are used as you say)
>
> Feb 10, 2020, 19:29 by voschix at gmail.com:
>
> Why are "stopping=yes|no" and "parking=yes|no" (and variants of these) not
> in use in OSM?
> But the much more complex "parking:lane:both=no_stopping" and
> "parking:lane:both=no_parking" are in use with the same meaning.
>
> Volker
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200210/258c93f5/attachment-0001.htm>