[Tagging] implied surface values?

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Feb 12, 2020, 12:51 by witwall3 at disroot.org:

> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:14:54AM +0000, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, 11 February 2020, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>> > OK, you confirm that the "paved is implied" statement in the wiki page is
>> > to be read as "assuming we are in Germany ... paved is implied" and is not
>> > referring to some wiki page that I have not yet detected (that was my
>> > question).
>> > 
>> In the UK too paved is implied, I have never used paved. Surface tags such as asphalt, setts, concrete add the detail of what sort of paved.
>>
>
> +1. Some of the Amazon people do seem to be adding unnecessary and
> unsurveyed surface=asphalt tags to many roads in the UK which I find
> quite irritating.
>
Have you tried commenting on their changesets?

If problem of such systematic damage continues - have you tried contacting DWG?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200212/414b7125/attachment-0001.htm>