[Tagging] implied surface values?

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

Am Do., 13. Feb. 2020 um 12:02 Uhr schrieb ael <witwall3 at disroot.org>:

>
> Well, yes, I thought that someone might say that. But such cases are
> very much the minority (except perhaps for motorways), which is why
> asphalt is still a reasonable default. I would expect an explicit
> tag for anything which is not asphalt. Again we are talking about the
> UK here.



at this point, one will likely decide to explicitly map asphalt as well,
because otherwise you can't tell whether it's asphalt or simply missing
more detailed information ;-)

Cheers
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200214/d3ef6965/attachment.htm>