[Tagging] Unremovable bollards
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Sun Feb 16 21:50:55 UTC 2020
On 16/2/20 10:29 pm, Florimond Berthoux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Checking https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/bollard#values
> unremovable is already used a lot, though irremovable is used also but
> four times less. So I guess you can document the value.
> (And no tag doesn't mean unremovable of course.)
>
> I would like to add that there's a common type in Paris "Potelet
> sécable" breakable bollard which are designed to break in two piece if
> pushed too much. [1] <http://urbaco.be/pdf/fprod/FP-BOBSEC(V1-FR).pdf>
> Only a small piece break, so they can be repaired quickly and for not
> much money.
> They are used a lot when firemen should be able to go with their
> trucks on an pedestrian area.
>
> No sure if those breakable bollards should be tag as
> bollard=unremovable with subtag (unremovable=breakable) or directly
> bollard=breakable.
Umm...
Bollards are there to protect people. With the present threats I would
think identifying which bollards could be easily driven through on a
public map/data base would be a bad idea.
So I would be firmly against the idea of the subtag value '=breakable'.
>
>
> [1] http://urbaco.be/pdf/fprod/FP-BOBSEC(V1-FR).pdf
> <http://urbaco.be/pdf/fprod/FP-BOBSEC(V1-FR).pdf>
>
> Le sam. 15 févr. 2020 à 19:54, Hauke Stieler <mail at hauke-stieler.de
> <mailto:mail at hauke-stieler.de>> a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> there's the "bollard" key with documented value "rising" and
> "removable"
> [0] but I often encounter also bollards which cannot be removed
> easily.
> I would love to see the "unremovable" value in the documentation.
> Should
> I open a proposal page for this one value? That sounds a bit of an
> overkill to me.
>
> My suggestion is the value "unremovable":
> A bollard which cannot be removed without destroying it or at least
> cause severe damage to it. A bollard which can only be removed by
> authorized people with some sort of key is still "removable".
>
> I would not use the value "fixed" or "irremovable" for two
> reasons: The
> "unremovable" value is used more often [1] and would be a good
> counter-value for "removable".
>
> Hauke
>
> [0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bollard
> [1] https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=bollard#values
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> --
> Florimond Berthoux
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200217/38d21031/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list