[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - drinking_water:refill_scheme

[European Water Project]

Hi Joseph,

Understood.

I will start a discussion on the proposal amendment/tweek after the vote
finishes tomorrow.

Best regards,

Stuart

On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 13:23, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com>
wrote:

> > For 2) What is the best way to proceed?
>
> Make another proposal to discuss that particular tag.
>
> - Joseph Eisenberg
>
> On 2/17/20, European Water Project <europeanwaterproject at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Tomorrow is the last day of voting.  The proposal has positive support ..
> > 10 + and 2 Abs
> >
> > There are two comments which are worth noting :
> >
> > 1 . It seems there is a strong preference for semicolon delimited scheme
> > names as a preferred alternative to refill_scheme = multiple. Untess
> there
> > are voiced objections, I will amend the proposal after the final vote to
> > take this into consideration.
> >
> > 2. Kovposch
> > <
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=User:Kovposch&action=edit&redlink=1
> >
> > suggested
> > making refill a namespace and changing refill_scheme to refill:network.
> > Intutitvely, this suggestion seems to be a good one, because of its more
> > generic nature. I also prefer the word "network" to "scheme" ...
> >
> > For 2) What is the best way to proceed ? It wouldn't be right to just
> > change the tag to something people haven't actually voted on.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Stuart
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 18:47, European Water Project <
> > europeanwaterproject at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Martin,
> >>
> >> If it is clear that there is drinking water available for refill for
> >> everyone there is no need to be part of a scheme.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Stuart
> >>
> >> On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 18:40, Martin Koppenhoefer
> >> <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 16:58 Uhr schrieb European Water Project <
> >>> europeanwaterproject at gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>>> I think they do need a sign or it is impossible to objectively map
> >>>> whether a bar will refill a bottle of water for free for anyone (ie
> >>>> paying
> >>>> or non-paying customer).
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I think if they provide a water tap in the customer area with a
> >>> "drinking
> >>> water" sign, it is perfectly ok and does not need more explanation.
> >>> Like in the linked photo above:
> >>>
> https://www.tripadvisor.com/LocationPhotoDirectLink-g187791-d1023845-i49797540-Palazzo_del_Freddo_Giovanni_Fassi-Rome_Lazio.html
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Martin
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Tagging mailing list
> >>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200217/2b155a74/attachment.htm>