[Tagging] key:drinking_water for OSM ways
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Fri Feb 21 07:23:49 UTC 2020
On 21/2/20 6:16 pm, European Water Project wrote:
> Hi Warin,
>
> contents=water seems more appropriate
That does not stipulate if it is drinking water.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stuart
>
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 07:38, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com
> <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> So a water tank with drinking water cannot be tagged as drinking
> water because there is no local access. Fine.
> Then it is only tagged as a tank with contents=water, or should
> there be yet another value for it contents=drinking_water?
> Or a sub tag water=drinking water...
>
>
> On 21/2/20 5:10 pm, European Water Project wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> There are a couple of issues I see with drinking_water=yes not
>> having a concept of access.
>>
>> 1. Where is the observability ? How can I know if a water tank
>> has drinking quality water or just agriculture quality water ?
>> From the wiki :
>> "One can assume that the water is pure when many people drink it
>> every day."
>> This is hard to assume, and one would never know if there is
>> water ...
>>
>> 2. But there is an even bigger issue --- and I will admit that
>> I am biased because of the European Water Project's use case.
>> For a map feature to be useful, it should have universality. Ie.
>> if one maps restaurants with toilets, at least customers should
>> have access ...
>> Someone who goes to the OSM way where there is a water tank, even
>> with a wallet full of cash, will die of thirst before getting a
>> drink.
>> It's similar to toilet=yes ... A restaurant with a toilet for
>> employees only, probably shouldn't have the tag.
>> Yes, there is an access tag, but in most cases access is implied.
>>
>> drinking_water = yes, seems to come with access in 99% of the
>> 61,300 nodes and the large majority of the 8,178 ways.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Stuart
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 19:33, Martin Koppenhoefer
>> <dieterdreist at gmail.com <mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Am Do., 20. Feb. 2020 um 19:14 Uhr schrieb European Water
>> Project <europeanwaterproject at gmail.com
>> <mailto:europeanwaterproject at gmail.com>>:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I have noticed that the the key drinking_water = yes for
>> ways is sometimes used in a manner not described in the wiki.
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Adrinking_water
>>
>> The issue has to do with ways which might store drinking
>> water which is not actually directly accessible. I think
>> this tag should be for accessible water.
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't read from the wiki description that the drinking
>> water must be directly accessible. It depends on the context
>> feature.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Martin
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200221/3f531eed/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list