[Tagging] recreational vs functional routes
pelderson at gmail.com
Tue Jan 7 21:16:47 UTC 2020
If a route meant for motor vehicles is waymarked as a recreational route,
why not use the same tagging system as for other recreational routes?
route=Xmn where X=l (local), r (regional), n (national) or i
(international) an mn is motor network
and other relevant tags
If the route is waymarked in both directions, chances are there will be a
lot of differences. You could use the role-based backward/forward ways
system as is usual in cycling routes or use separate relations for the
directions, then put them together in a parent relation.
The roles in routes discussion would then apply, too.
Fr gr Peter Elderson
Op di 7 jan. 2020 om 20:52 schreef Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com>:
> AFAIK, routes such as the Krekenroute in Belgium as signposted with
> https://images.app.goo.gl/bFnEWw7FVoyfq83x8 (although I thought at on
> some signs there is also the silhouette of a car)
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 8:39 PM Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> wrote:
> > joost schouppe <joost.schouppe at gmail.com>:
> > > Especially for car routes, I haven't seen any way to tag touristic
> routes for driving cars, like the Turist Veger in Norway or the Route des
> Cols in France
> > Are these routes waymarked as special routes?
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Tagging mailing list
> > > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging