[Tagging] recreational vs functional routes

Peter Elderson pelderson at gmail.com
Thu Jan 9 23:14:18 UTC 2020

Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven

> I think;
> Those who bicycle know why there needs to be these classes.
> Those who don't ride a bicycle regularly see no need for these classes. 

I wonder which of these groups you think I am in...

Hint: Nederland. 

> For those that see no need for these classes .. what harm will they do to the data base?
> I am ignoring the 'verification' argument for the time being.
> P.S. I personally see no need to specify how a power line is attached to a pole .. others are quite happy to map such detail.  So I have no objection to there mapping, I will never use it nor map it. 
> On 10/1/20 7:36 am, Peter Elderson wrote:
>> I don't see why it's not a type=route route=bicycle. Bicycle routes do not have to be exclusive or any particular type of road, just signposted as a bicycle route. You can tag extra attributes of course.
>> Best, Peter Elderson

More information about the Tagging mailing list