[Tagging] recreational vs functional routes

Peter Elderson pelderson at gmail.com
Sun Jan 12 16:57:55 UTC 2020


Sorry, but this is not a useful classification for bicycle routes in
Nederland.

Best, Peter Elderson


Op zo 12 jan. 2020 om 17:34 schreef Florimond Berthoux <
florimond.berthoux at gmail.com>:

> Le sam. 11 janv. 2020 à 22:22, Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> >
> >  Florimond Berthoux <florimond.berthoux at gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> So I propose to use for bicycle route
> >> bicycle:type=trekking/road_bike/commute/mtb
> >>
> >
> > I don't think commute is a type of bicycle? Trekking maybe, but here in
> Nederland they call a lot of bicycles "trekking" when they are really just
> city bikes with a few extra gears and some fancy accessories.
> > We also don't have a type "road bike". We do have "Omafiets"
> (Grandmother's bike), mainly used by schoolgirls and young women.
> Grandmothers have e-bikes, nowadays.
>
> bicycle:type describe the type of cycle activity of the route not
> precisely the type of the bicycle. (Though commuter bike is a type of
> bicycle and you have road biking in Netherland
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_National_Road_Race_Championships).
> So values should be (if my english is right):
> bicycle:type=trekking/road_biking/commuting/mtb
>
> --
> Florimond Berthoux
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200112/7798573e/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list