[Tagging] amenity=vending_machine/vending=bottle_return - operator=

Marc Gemis marc.gemis at gmail.com
Mon Jan 13 05:48:57 UTC 2020


I was thinking of speciality beers (which do not come in crates), but
especially of wine bottles. AFAIK, there is little to no difference in the
bottle, but it might depend on who bottled the wine. If the wine is bottled
by the supermarket itself, you can return the bottle, otherwise not. At
least that is what I think.
That why I was confused by Martin's remark "typology of container that is
accepted". I thought he meant crates vs single bottles, but he meant thin
and thick glass.

I agree with you that brand for beer and soda drinks is important on
whether they are accepted or not.

But in the end, I,, as a consumer do not know whether the bottles that I
bring back for reuse, will actually be reused. Perhaps after a few
reuse-cycles, the bottles are recycled.

To come back to tagging: so people seem to have a problem with
amenity=recycle in case of reuse, but do not have a problem with
amenity=vending_machine for such a machine (that does not sell anything).
Or am I mistaken?


regards

m.

On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 6:26 PM Jake Edmonds via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> Here is the list of brands accepted at three stores near by. I also
> checked two others, one had a picture of various shapes and colours (with
> no labels) of bottles and the other lists ‘beer 0,33l, beer 0,5l) but both
> did have a list of which brands of plastic crates are accepted
>
> Fresh
>
> Fresh 2
>
> Billa
>
> Birell
>
> Birell
>
>
> Budwar
>
> Budwar
>
> Budwar
>
> Budweiser
>
> Budweiser
>
>
> Corgoň
>
> Corgoň
>
> Corgoň
>
> Heineken
>
> Heineken
>
> Heineken
>
> Kachelman
>
> Kachelman
>
> Kachelman
>
> Kelt
>
> Kelt
>
> Kelt
>
> Kozel
>
> Kozel
>
> Kozel
>
> Krušovice
>
> Krušovice
>
>
> Pilsner
>
> Pilsner
>
> Pilsner
>
> Šariš
>
> Šariš
>
> Šariš
>
> Smädný Mních
>
> Smädný Mních
>
> Smädný Mních
>
> Starobrno
>
> Starobrno
>
> Starobrno
>
> Zlatý Bažant
>
> Zlatý Bažant
>
> Zlatý Bažant
>
>
>
>
>
> Steiger
>
> Steiger
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Budiš
>
>
>
> Fatra
>
>
>
> Gambrinus
>
>
>
> Gemer
>
>
>
> Grošák
>
>
>
> Martiner
>
>
>
> Sitňan
>
>
>
> Staropramen
>
>
>
> Topvar
>
>
>
>
> 14
>
> 15
>
> 21
>
>
>
> Sent from Jake Edmonds' iPhone
>
> On 12 Jan 2020, at 18:15, Marc Gemis <marc.gemis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
>
> Is the different between recycling and reusing important for the average
> consumer who a) wants to claim their deposit and b)  doesn’t want to put
> the item into landfill?
>
>
>
> first of all it is indicating the (rough) typology of container that is
> accepted, secondly it would seem strange to tag something “recycling” when
> it’s actually much more beneficial for the environment because of reuse.
>
>
> I don't understand this "typology of container that is accepted". Some
> glass bottles I have into put a container, others I can return to a
> shop and get some money back. There is no difference in container, the
> only difference is a mark on the bottle itself.
>
> regards
>
> m.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200113/91c625e7/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list