[Tagging] Rare route=* values - route=power

François Lacombe fl.infosreseaux at gmail.com
Tue Jan 14 00:53:22 UTC 2020


Le mar. 14 janv. 2020 à 01:33, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com>
a écrit :

> > Debate is open about route=power which may be replaced by a more
> meaningful tag (power=circuit for instance)
>
> +1 to this idea of power=circuit. And then use "type=power" instead of
> "type=route" if you make a relation,


This is a point of the whole debate and, why not type=power + power=circuit.

But i'm merely against power=circuit_segment and independent relations for
branch and trunk.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_routing_proposal#Advanced_cases:_branching

According to experience in France, a single relation involving all lines
and substations with appropriate roles (trunk, branch, whatever) is enough
and doesn't force to create several relations.
This point have to be cleared with proposal authors prior to vote.


> or if the circuit is less than a
> few hundred nodes you could just use a linear way.
>

I don't get that point.
Circuits need to be a relation.
A single way can't do the job since you have two substations to involve at
least.

All the best
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200114/1eace58a/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list