[Tagging] building=disused

Markus selfishseahorse at gmail.com
Tue Jan 14 19:55:49 UTC 2020

On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 20:21, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that the point has just been reinforced that debates over
> subtle ontologic questions, such as "is the building that the shop
> occupies a shop, or not?" are the usual outcome of this sort of
> discussion,

My point was that the different uses of disused: and disused=yes may
not be as problematical ("tagging for the renderer") as they seem, but
that there seem to be valid reasons for it.



More information about the Tagging mailing list