[Tagging] building=disused
Markus
selfishseahorse at gmail.com
Tue Jan 14 19:55:49 UTC 2020
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 20:21, Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think that the point has just been reinforced that debates over
> subtle ontologic questions, such as "is the building that the shop
> occupies a shop, or not?" are the usual outcome of this sort of
> discussion,
My point was that the different uses of disused: and disused=yes may
not be as problematical ("tagging for the renderer") as they seem, but
that there seem to be valid reasons for it.
Regards
Markus
More information about the Tagging
mailing list