[Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 124, Issue 109 no 5 disused=:

[St Niklaas]

Hi Paul

++1

Hendrikklaas

________________________________
Van: tagging-request at openstreetmap.org <tagging-request at openstreetmap.org>
Verzonden: donderdag 16 januari 2020 17:50
Aan: tagging at openstreetmap.org <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Onderwerp: Tagging Digest, Vol 124, Issue 109

Send Tagging mailing list submissions to
        tagging at openstreetmap.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        tagging-request at openstreetmap.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        tagging-owner at openstreetmap.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Tagging digest..."


Today's Topics:

   5. Re: building=disused (Paul Allen)

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:48:15 +0000
From: Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com>
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
        <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Tagging] building=disused
Message-ID:
        <CAPy1dO+=2BhfX9SNyak+jgph6wdx9djGm9B0TPd+Jo_65jDipA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 14:55, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at tutanota.com>
wrote:

>
> 16 Jan 2020, 02:22 by 61sundowner at gmail.com:
>
> If the 'standard map' starts rendering 'disused=yes' the same way as
> 'disused:*=*' (presently not rendered) then what?
>
> Then standard map style will be fixed to
> remove this bug.
>

I took Warin's question to mean what would happen if standard carto
deliberately chose to handle disused=yes the same way as
disused:*=*.  Therefore not a bug to be fixed, but an intentional
permanent change to behaviour.

If that happened, I would stop marking physical objects as disused.  The
fact that a physical object exists, and is therefore rendered, is far more
important than whether it is in use or not.  I suspect many mappers would
do the same.  I'd add a note saying that it's disused, so might many other
mappers.  But notes are free-form, so they may use words other than
"disused."  That would make it harder to craft reliable queries to find or
ignore disused objects of a particular type.

--
Paul

++!

Hendrikklaas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200119/6358f306/attachment.htm>