[Tagging] RFC free_water
European Water Project
europeanwaterproject at gmail.com
Tue Jan 21 09:20:00 UTC 2020
I can see your logic, even if I still prefer drinking_water:free. One more
issue I see with drinking_water:fee.
If a cafe is tagged "drinking_water:fee=yes", it could lead people
erroneously to believe that the tagged cafe sells water ?
It could be that the café or ice cream parlour doesn't sell bottle in
single-use PET bottles or have drinking quality water tap water.
On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 09:59, Florimond Berthoux <
florimond.berthoux at gmail.com> wrote:
> Le lun. 20 janv. 2020 à 16:16, European Water Project
> <europeanwaterproject at gmail.com> a écrit :
> > Dear Florimond,
> > What seems preferable about drinking_water:free=<no/yes/customers> is
> that it is a tag that offers a complete response .
> > drinking_water:fee, necessitates a follow up qualification. If no, then
> for whom if not for everyone ? If yes, then how much and is it the same fee
> for customers and non-customers alike?
> No, for me these tags are equal
> drinking_water:free=no <=> drinking_water:fee=yes
> drinking_water:free=yes <=> drinking_water:fee=no
> drinking_water:free=customers <=> drinking_water:fee=free_for_customers
> Florimond Berthoux
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging