[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Ground)
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Fri Jul 10 09:37:11 UTC 2020
Why it would be natural=bare_ground rather than natural=bare_soil?
Using "ground" and defining it as "soil, not all kinds of ground" will not go well.
natural=bare_ground for me is clearly including also natural=bare_rock,
while natural=bare_soil would avoid this
Jul 10, 2020, 11:16 by michael.montani at un.org:
> Dear mappers,
> after the discussion we had through the tagging ML > "Are we mapping ground on OSM?" <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-July/053793.html>> , it has been open a feature proposal to map ground on OSM.
> Tag: natural = bare_ground (but many other options are open to discussion).
> Description: "> An area covered by soil, without any vegetation> "
> You can find the proposal wikipage > here <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Ground>> .
> I hope this proposal will receive as many contributions possible, thank you
> > Michael Montani
> > GIS Consultant> ,> > Client Solutions Delivery Section
> > Service for Geospatial Information and Telecommunications Technologies
> > United Nations Global Service Centre
> > United Nations Department of Operational Support
> > Brindisi> > |> > Phone: +39 0831 056985> > |> > Mobile: +39 3297193455> > |> > Intermission: 158 6985>
> E-mail:> > michael.monta> ni at u> n.org <mailto:mail at un.org>> > |> > www.ungsc.org <http://www.ungsc.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging