[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Ground)

[Michael Montani]

I agree it could be considered as humus. The distinction between organic soil and humus is ambiguous according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humus , but I think it is general enough to target mostly organic soil.

Shall we consider to add this specification on the tagging? Or would humus be considered as bare soil anyway?

Thanks

--
Michael Montani
GIS Consultant, Client Solutions Delivery Section
Service for Geospatial Information and Telecommunications Technologies
United Nations Global Service Centre
United Nations Department of Operational Support

Brindisi | Phone: +39 0831 056985 | Mobile: +39 3297193455 | Intermission: 158 6985
E-mail: michael.montani at un.org<mailto:mail at un.org> | www.ungsc.org<http://www.ungsc.org>

[cid:072fe9f2-17da-426c-b4c6-c25f4370d75b]

________________________________
Da: Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com>
Inviato: venerdì 10 luglio 2020 12:02
A: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Oggetto: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Ground)

Organic without any mineral, would you still call that soil?

Vr gr Peter Elderson


Op vr 10 jul. 2020 om 11:55 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com<mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>>:


sent from a phone

> On 10. Jul 2020, at 11:39, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org<mailto:tagging at openstreetmap.org>> wrote:
>
> Why it would be natural=bare_ground rather than natural=bare_soil?


+1,
I also disagree that “soil can be organic or mineral”. It has typically both, organic and mineral components, but organic components are a hard requirement. Otherwise it would be sand, or rock, or silt or clay or loam etc. (depending on grain size/s).

Cheers Martin



_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging at openstreetmap.org<mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200710/cc0a4b2b/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Outlook-lkbaor4o.png
Type: image/png
Size: 8546 bytes
Desc: Outlook-lkbaor4o.png
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200710/cc0a4b2b/attachment-0001.png>