[Tagging] site relations for city walls?

Taskar Center uwtcat at uw.edu
Sun Jul 12 19:13:28 UTC 2020


Why is the relation type on the Berlin Wall a “collection” rather than “boundary”?

Thanks,
Anat


Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.

> On Jul 12, 2020, at 11:52 AM, yo paseopor <yopaseopor at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Big sense, nerver forget.
> What about that?
> 
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6651797#map=11/52.5183/13.2976
> 
> Health (more now than never) and maps
> yopaseopor
> 
>> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 8:44 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Someone has made a site relation for the Aurelian citywalls in Rome. 
>> Does this make sense to you?
>> We‘re speaking of a generally linear object of many kilometers length, in parts fragmented / interrupted.
>> 
>> Cheers Martin 
>> 
>> sent from a phone
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200712/0351e055/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list