[Tagging] site relations for city walls?

Lionel Giard lionel.giard at gmail.com
Mon Jul 13 16:16:33 UTC 2020


The aurelian walls left today are not one continuous element, so the site
relation is practical as it allows to group all the linear or area features
that are forming the old city walls.
I used many time in cities when few ruins of the same original object exist
at different places (often walls), so you can clearly link them together
with this relation. ^_^

Best Regards,
Lionel

Le lun. 13 juil. 2020 à 09:00, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
a écrit :

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 13. Jul 2020, at 05:59, Yves <ycai at mailbox.org> wrote:
> >
> > Why do you say "A site means things are concentrated around a point",
> sites relation helps to map disjoint elements, but I don't think I saw
> anything about their repartition.
>
>
> it is my interpretation of the term “site” and a kind of proposal to
> modify the site relation description in the wiki
>
>
> > Also it certainly makes no sense to have sites extending over extremely
> large areas.
>
>
> at least not if they aren’t “compact”
>
> Cheers Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20200713/9bf9003c/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list