[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (Ground)
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Tue Jul 14 13:29:18 UTC 2020
Maybe. I would be interested in specific
14 Jul 2020, 14:24 by voschix at gmail.com:
> I am not a land cover expert, but have come across a great number of obviously wrong land cover tagging in OSM.
> Said this, why not try to use CORINE  definitions?
>  > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordination_of_Information_on_the_Environment
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2020, 11:52 Christoph Hormann, <> osm at imagico.de> > wrote:
>> > Joseph Eisenberg <>> joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com>> > hat am 13. Juli 2020 um 22:34 geschrieben:
>> > >> https://www.flickr.com/photos/chrishunkeler/32097822997
>> I think this is a great example why more specific tags are advisable to use in OSM than a generic bare ground tag.
>> What this picture shows is commonly known as desert pavement:
>> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desert_pavement
>> Apart from varying in size distribution and density as well as material of the stones these form a fairly characteristic surface that can and should be mapped distinctly. As size of the larger stones strongly affects navigability, specifying that would be a valuable supplemental tag.
>> Christoph Hormann
>> >> http://www.imagico.de/
>> Tagging mailing list
>> >> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging