[Tagging] Is there a good way to indicate "pushing bicycle not allowed here"?
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed Jul 22 09:05:38 UTC 2020
It happens in some places, see
bicycle_pushed=no was suggested in previous discussion, see
Jul 22, 2020, 10:29 by oliversimmo at gmail.com:
> It seems highly strange that you wouldn't even be allowed to carry/push your bike, are you sure that was what it meant?
> Do you have a picture of the sign?
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2020, 22:50 Allroads, <> allroadsworld at gmail.com> > wrote:
>> There lots of forest roads/path, where the bicycle/pushed carried is prohibited. Mostly, private owned land with a access_sign.
>> “the bicycle” “transportation vehicle” is prohibited.
>> Because, navigation programs do not us bicycle=no, as a hard no, there is the need for a extra value.
>> bicycle=explicit_no, means “the vehicle” is prohibited.
>> Why a value?
>> We need a one value, otherwise a lot of more keys, which makes it things complicated. At the end it means for all explicit no!
>> bicycle_pushed <>>> =>> no <>
>> horse_pushed=no ;-)
>> Better one value, key=explicit_no
>> What do you think?
>> If we do not solve this problem, this stays forever.
>> On the wiki page dismount, this bicycle_pushed is mentioned.
>> For me a wrong advise.
>> The problem is wider for more transportation modes, even for other product to carry around.
>> Private access_sign rules, can go much further then traffic_sign. In what is prohibited.
>> What the owner think and write down on the sign is valid.
>> The skateboard is prohibited, means you can not carry a skateboard around with you.
>> I need this value to do it correctly. Where the bicycle is no allowed. Or a other value meaning the same.
>> Tagging mailing list
>> >> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging